The feature article photograph is a group shot of the band ‘Veronica Falls’. Each band member is standing/sitting around some steps in an urban area. This makes it appear as if the band are ‘hanging around’. Each member also has an atmosphere of idleness about them (the person on the right idly clutching his hand and the woman at the front with her head in her hand, for example). This gives a general feeling of boredom and nonchalance, which gives quite an attractive idea of the band being almost completely disinterested in their newfound fame, which could be perceived as being quite cool, and this ‘coolness’ is attractive to the reader. In addition, the fact that they are nonchalant about their fame shows that they have not been changed by popularity, and are essentially still normal people. This lack of obnoxiousness is attractive to the magazine’s audience, who don’t typically enjoy that side of mainstream music. The fact that they are in a unglamorous environment fortifies the fact that fame is not a big deal for the band. The subjects of the photograph are all dressed ironically, with massive turned-up jeans and denim jackets. The fact that they are dressed like this – and not fashionably – further supports that the band are independent and reflects the genre of music that the band play and the magazine cover.
The masthead is bold and blocky, with very refined corners in places and smooth curves in others, giving it a very clean and sleek look. It is pure black, which contrasts with the pure white background; these colours contrast one another which makes the masthead stand out. All of these factors make the masthead pleasing to the eye. It is also very neat as it reaches across the entirety of the section of top of the page that is not confined by the 'bordered' layout, and as a result is completely separate from the feature article photograph, which actually draws attention to the masthead.
The cover line 'Veronica Falls' stands out from the feature article photograph. Each letter is contained in separate white boxes of equal sizes that are equal distances apart. The black text stands out against the colour of the boxes, and the plain white of the boxes stands out against the varied colours of the feature article photograph. This separation of cover line and feature article photograph makes the cover appear clean and impressive, without being loud and imposing. This is appealing to the eye and appeals to the magazine’s audience. Also, rather than being aligned to the left or right of the page, this cover line breaks convention by being centred. This is effective as it makes the cover line the next thing on the page that the reader will be likely to see (after the masthead). This means the reader will instantly know who the feature article is featuring, which gives a smoother and cleaner viewing experience. This is appealing to the magazine’s audience.
The magazine’s cover is essentially devoid of puff and plug, due to the fact that it does not need to sell itself, as it is free of charge. This also means that the magazine is able to appeal to the smaller and more specific audience of people who do not enjoy mainstream music. The fact that there is not much text on the cover also makes it appear more orderly, which is aesthetically pleasing. In addition, the text that is on the page all follows an orderly format, and is not italicised or slanted in any way, again, creating an orderly feel.
Yet again addressing the orderly feel of the magazine, the entire front cover seems to be confined to a white border, as there are points where the text and image do not cross. This breaks the convention of magazine covers filling the entirety of the page, and therefore makes the magazine stand out. It also makes the magazine appear, again, orderly and clean.
This is the
contents page for the November 2011 issue of ‘Loud and Quiet’. It is of rather
plain design with very limited colour and a large amount of negative space. The
simplicity of this design is quite appealing to look at, due to its incredibly
neat and tidy layout. There is also no specific focus of the page, which is
quite calming. However, as there is nothing to catch the reader’s eye, many
readers could find the page boring and unattractive.
The text on
the page consists of sans serif fonts, with the titles of each article in a
larger font size than the information below it. Although these fonts do look
pleasant, the readability of them is not ideal. For example, for the title of
each article, the font is quite skinny, which makes it more difficult to read
than a wider font. The information about each article (beneath the titles) is
also in a very small size, which is also quite difficult to read. Although the
black colour of the text on the white background makes the text stand out and
improves it's readability, the text is too small for this to have any effect.
Additionally, the page numbers themselves have the same sort of issues, in that
they are uninteresting and do not stand out at all. This would mean that someone
reading this page would not instantly know where to find the article that they
would like to read, which means that the page does not complete it's function
well at all. Adding to the lack of functionality are the pictures next to each
listed article. These rather small pictures are pictures of the page that the
listed article is on. This is very unconventional, and for good reason; the
pictures are far too small to gather any information from, and too uninteresting
to look at. Taking all of these issues into account, the contents page appears
more like a menu. Although unconventionality is normally respected in this type
of magazine, this page simply does not function as a contents page, as it would
take too long for the reader to locate the desired article.
However, the
information about each article, is actually quite engaging. For example,
“Adopted by Brooklyn after having made the same album twice” makes the reader
ask questions and makes them want to know more about this story, which will make
them dive into the magazine and turn the pages.
The
standfirst is, as mentioned, the same font and size as the headline. It is
printed in black and is not aligned like the headline, but is rather aligned
normally. I feel that the standfirst is quite effective as it fulfils its
function of making the reader ask questions and therefore want to read the
article that follows it. Also, the words ‘Veronica Falls’ are highlighted in
grey, which makes them stand out and tells the reader who the article will be
about.
The
second page of the article is filled (up to the white border which is present on
every page of the magazine) with a photograph of the band. Similarly to the
picture on the front cover, the band are dressed ironically, which I perceive as
being appealing to the magazine’s audience. The angle at which the photograph
has been taken is rather unconventional, as almost all of the top half of the
image is just of the background (a New York apartment block) behind the band.
Although this has been done to contextualise that most of the article is about
the band in New York, I feel that it makes the picture seem a lot less personal
and therefore less effective.
The third page of the article consists only of
another picture of the band, similar in some ways to the one on the front cover.
The placement of this picture is effective as it means that the reader can see
the band while they are reading about them, which I believe is a very important
feature.
The use of drop caps (If they can be classified
as drop caps) is incredibly unconventional and ineffective, in my opinion. The
first 'example' is at the top-left of the fourth page of the article. Rather
than highlighting the first letter, the first few words have been made larger,
and completely separate from the text. This, to me, looks like a headline no
matter how many times I read it. This same technique is used at the start of the
fifth page, but to even worse effect, as the words that have been enlarged do
not make logical sense on their own, and thus cannot be used as a headline.
The other use of a 'drop cap' is a large capital 'T' at the start of the fourth paragraph on page four of the article, but it does not drop at all. Instead, it acts the same way as normal text, and is not attractive to look at.
The other use of a 'drop cap' is a large capital 'T' at the start of the fourth paragraph on page four of the article, but it does not drop at all. Instead, it acts the same way as normal text, and is not attractive to look at.
On the top right of the fourth page of the
article, lies a rather dull and uninteresting pull quote. Although the subject
matter of the quote is not uninspiring, the style of font used is not appealing,
as it is quite bland. In addition, the positioning of the quote is not
effective, as it is completely separate from the main body of text. This means,
as there are no compelling features to draw the reader to the text, the text may
be simply skipped by less interested readers. On the sixth page, another pull
quote is used. Although it is 'within' the text, it is still not conventional
and still remains 'distant' from the main body of
text.
The main body of text throughout the article is
black, so as to be easily readable on the white background. It is in a serif
font and serves its purpose well, as it is easily readable.





No comments:
Post a Comment